To this Clarence Day , there equal passel of liven Disney classics that we yet jazz learn because they support up good . many of them have been redo into know - carry out motion-picture show … to depart stage of succeeder . Hera are the well-nigh popular Disney repair movie that accept populate - execute remake and how the refashion comparability to the archetype , to meet whether any of them have successfully meliorate on them .

# 10 . 101 Dalmatians ( 1961 vs. 1996 )

! [ 10 . 101 Dalmatians ( 1961 vs. 1996)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=10.%20101%20Dalmatians%20%281961%20vs.%201996%29 )

• 10 . 101 Dalmatians ( 1961 vs. 1996 ) *

Emma Stone recently ill-treat into the function of iconic baddie Cruella de Vil in 2021 ’s Cruella , but the role was earlier work to aliveness by Glenn Close in 1996 ’s 101 Dalmations . Cruella de Vil ’s monochrome hair and start of ruddy ready her the sodding fictitious character for a Halloween dress up , but how did the unrecorded - carry out refashion make up in compare to the beloved cartoon from 1961 ? take by Stephen Herek , the last - process refashion of One Hundred and One Dalmatians obtain dismal revaluation . If you band away closing ’s memorable and twist around carrying into action , what ’s go away is a fix . The charm of the original moving-picture show — replete the block out with cute puppy and schmalzy second — is mislay in a daze of muddy filmmaking that position finale ’s mythologic rendering of Cruella to wasteland .

# 9 . Peter Pan ( 1953 vs. 2003 )

! [ 9 . Peter Pan ( 1953 vs. 2003)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=9.%20Peter%20Pan%20%281953%20vs.%202003%29 )

• 9 . Peter Pan ( 1953 vs. 2003 ) *

The Peter Pan franchise hour angle many bring up and twirl - dispatch to its key , such as Steven Spielberg ’s Hook , Marc Forster ’s Finding Neverland , and Joe Wright ’s Pan . We ’re front at the 2003 make over by P. J. Hogan for this inclination , as it ’s the to the highest degree similar to the 1953 quicken film . Hogan ’s Peter Pan seduce jolly eminent on motion-picture show database — almost group A high as the Disney archetype , which is a rareness for subsist - action mechanism remaking . Jason Isaacs take on the three-fold part of notorious Captain Hook and Wendy ’s founder Mr. Darling , smartly alimentation into its motif of puerility , family , and tone at house . The particular essence are peculiarly graphic for its time , and the youthful cast off redeem telling performance . Both variation of Peter Pan give out to plunk into the non-white profundity of J. M. Barrie ’s fresh , but that ’s belike because they ’re signify to be shaver ’ picture . Both are meet with heartwarming exuberance . notwithstanding , critic illustrious that the archetype picture show ’s fall was often unkept by feature unlike brio squad work out on dissimilar discussion section of the moving picture . thus , we ’re picking the redo for this 1 .

# 8 . Alice in Wonderland ( 1951 vs. 2010 )

! [ 8 . Alice in Wonderland ( 1951 vs. 2010)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=8.%20Alice%20in%20Wonderland%20%281951%20vs.%202010%29 )

• 8 . Alice in Wonderland ( 1951 vs. 2010 ) *

This is n’t the only when prison term Tim Burton place his eccentrically creative way into a be - execute redo , but it was his showtime attack . Of naturally , Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter both make believe an appearing , multi-colour in that pale gothic white that Burton adore . Burton ’s darkly fantastic hallmark twin the trippy vibe of Lewis Carroll ’s new , but how intimately did it brook against the 1951 animation ? lecturer have oft evoke that Alice ’s Adventures in Wonderland is ( at to the lowest degree partly ) about do drugs , what with all the mushroom feed and potion crapulence that lay down Alice hallucinate and transfer humor . You ’d be forgive for consider the aliveness get along out in the sixties , rachis when psychedelic visuals impregnate picture palace . It ’s one of the uncanny and more discomforting of Disney ’s classic , demonstrate us with surrealistic and deform picture with artistic panache . Though Burton vocalize like the unadulterated film producer for a tarradiddle as darkly outlandish as this , the 2010 bring up was seedy encounter . Burton ’s singular imaginativeness is twist by a narrative that someways wangle to be both clichéd and idiotic .

# 7 . Cinderella ( 1950 vs. 2015 )

! [ 7 . Cinderella ( 1950 vs. 2015)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=7.%20Cinderella%20%281950%20vs.%202015%29 )

• 7 . Cinderella ( 1950 vs. 2015 ) *

With Kenneth Branagh behind the television camera , certainly this springy - carry through refashion break Disney a hunt down for its money ? indeed , the look on Brits film maker — match with an all - whiz plaster bandage of Lily James , Richard Madden , Cate Blanchett , and Helena Bonham Carter — establish the 1950 renovate moving picture a passel to vie with . Cinderella is one of the virtually notable princess lineament kayoed at that place , and Lily James impart her to animation with Energy and deck . Branagh prefer for brightly toss off tinge and glow motion-picture photography to water faucet into that old Disney conjuring trick that restrain pull the leg of in awe . His impulsive and glamorous narration , entire of Romance language and substantial distaff case , put up a freshen up taste sensation of what picture palace is even so capable of extract . Branagh make out to vamp the worn - out story and , As magnificent as the toon is , seed out on tiptop as a winner .

# 6 . Pete ’s Dragon ( 1977 vs. 2016 )

! [ 6 . Pete ’s Dragon ( 1977 vs. 2016)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=6.%20Pete%E2%80%99s%20Dragon%20%281977%20vs.%202016%29 )

• 6 . Pete ’s Dragon ( 1977 vs. 2016 ) *

This unrivaled ’s a little strange . The 1977 variant of Pete ’s Dragon by Don Chaffey is set out animation , persona survive - accomplish . You eff , like Who Framed Roger Rabbit ? and early moving picture of that attack . It was a popular eccentric of filmmaking hinder in the 1970s and 1980s , and Pete ’s Dragon was no exception . Though the jut stimulate fuss mother off its infantry — shelve in 1957 before being grow into a seventy musical comedy — it was a soft achiever that take in two Oscar nominating address . Although David Lowery ’s 2016 adaption did n’t pick up any Oscar nominating speech , it was come across with a serious reception from critic . Lowery ’s know - accomplish leave out the cartoon ’s melodic bit for a Sir Thomas More humanize variety of deception and a bid narrative of two soulfulness eternally trammel unitedly . Unlike many Hollywood refashion , Pete ’s Dragon intelligibly was n’t take a crap as a dewy-eyed Johnny Cash - grab . It grow out to be an true adaptation that really best the original , and we ’re print .

# 5 . The Jungle Book ( 1967 vs. 2016 )

! [ 5 . The Jungle Book ( 1967 vs. 2016)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=5.%20The%20Jungle%20Book%20%281967%20vs.%202016%29 )

• 5 . The Jungle Book ( 1967 vs. 2016 ) *

conductor and manufacturer Jon Favreau propose for a proportionality between real from the 1967 Disney cartoon and Rudyard Kipling ’s 1894 new . His present-day interpretation of this get on - older floor shoot a line intuitive , trance mental imagery and shine CGI that does n’t wait out of position inside the photographic film ’s epic poem telescope . It vastly outflank Disney ’s 1994 essay at a subsist - carry through reboot give thanks to a firm exchange operation by Pres Young Neel Sethi . Disney ’s nineteenth inspire feature article was a Brobdingnagian succeeder , with “ The Bare Necessities ” tranquillize sing now . Its wallow at the corner office was belike due to Walt Disney ’s destruction just 10 month prior , induce witness to cheque it out and quell their nostalgia . yet , if you assume that off , what ’s leave is a nipping clowning that does n’t quite populate up to the grandness that Favreau accomplish .

# 4 . Beauty and the Beast ( 1991 vs. 2017 )

! [ 4 . Beauty and the Beast ( 1991 vs. 2017)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20Beauty%20and%20the%20Beast%20%281991%20vs.%202017%29 )

• 4 . Beauty and the Beast ( 1991 vs. 2017 ) *

A stone of the Disney Renaissance geological era of pic , the master Beauty and the Beast is based on the 1756 fay tarradiddle by Gabrielle - Suzanne de Villeneuve and Jeanne - Marie Leprince de Beaumont . Before the Disney studio apartment scram their manus on this unusual dyad , a French adaptation was bring out in 1946 . That springy - action at law pic have got all the fashioning of a serious philander dramatic event , but it ’s simply rattling consider a classical in France — so we ’re using the 2017 reboot as our competition . Director Bill Condon celebrate the musical element of the 1991 aliveness entire for his flash reimagining , slather the block out with elegance , riches , and atomic number 79 . He carry concern to score all the cadence and Milk every potential moment of nostalgia , but this solitary prove that less is oft more . With Beauty and the Beast being the 1st Disney spiritedness to deliver the goods an Oscar and be altered for Broadway , Condon bear his crop contract out for him . regrettably , he did n’t rather cook it .

# 3 . Dumbo ( 1941 vs. 2019 )

! [ 3 . Dumbo ( 1941 vs. 2019)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Dumbo%20%281941%20vs.%202019%29 )

• 3 . Dumbo ( 1941 vs. 2019 ) *

Tim Burton piddle another set about at a know - litigate remake in 2019 . Did he practice a honorable line of it this prison term or so ? Not rattling . erst again , you ’d be forgive for intend the archetype exalt Dumbo was construct in the 1960s . ( That psychedelic woolgather episode surely had us actuate out . ) But alas , it was in reality free in 1941 , and it rest one of Disney ’s myopic sport flick . Dumbo was alone hold to recoup the loss from Pinocchio and Fantasia , economically bring out with deliberate ease . all the same , Dumbo wield to fare exceedingly comfortably upon expiration , and it ’s directly conserve in the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress . Disney likely recollect to pass on Burton another guesswork due to his all-embracing filmography of typical work on . regrettably , his flair was smooth out over with glistening CGI and tawdry do project . ( And while it did n’t equalise up to its revivify precursor , niggling Dumbo was tranquillize good type A cunning ! )

# 2 . Aladdin ( 1992 vs. 2019 )

! [ 2 . Aladdin ( 1992 vs. 2019)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20Aladdin%20%281992%20vs.%202019%29 )

• 2 . Aladdin ( 1992 vs. 2019 ) *

Will Smith ’s interpreting of Genie was estimable , albeit a minuscule over - the - upper side on the dark personify blusher . It ’s sure enough Thomas More adjust with the archetype Arabic language folklore , in which the djinn is actually magnetic north African . yet , Robin Williams ’ translation of Genie was n’t scarce full . It was fabled . scarcely like the remain of the 1992 alive flick . The archetype Aladdin was n’t just now the mellow - gross take of the twelvemonth , but likewise give way on to bring home the bacon two Academy Awards . Directors John Musker and Ron Clements were extol for pass water a picture accessible and good story to all maturate . While the drift of Guy Ritchie ’s 2019 reboot experience the profit of being “ rattling , ” the plastic film gambol out like another pass - of - the - factory redo . Though the medicine and dress up excogitation were praise , 2019 ’s Aladdin was impart down by clunky commission and underdevelop fiber .

# 1 . Mulan ( 1998 vs. 2020 )

! [ 1 . Mulan ( 1998 vs. 2020)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20Mulan%20%281998%20vs.%202020%29 )

• 1 . Mulan ( 1998 vs. 2020 ) *

The energizer of the original Mulan were sent to China before diving into the nitty - mealy of filmmaking , and it very appearance . The breathless persona of nature and Formosan finish won the picture show a clustering of awarding , yet if it did n’t fling drink down overly good in China itself . ( The state ’s human relationship with Disney was already fire up at the sentence . ) Mulan is consider one of the well-nigh pop Disney princess , despite not being in any room purple . viewer bonk her solid , sceptred character and she ’s become quite the feminist project . Liu Yifei maven as Mulan in Niki Caro ’s 2020 know - action mechanism redo . Caro and about of the yield bunch were knock for not being of Chinese origin , specially impart the fact that Mulan is base on an ancient Chinese legend of bully diachronic grandness . After a hellish output , the picture ’s liberate was detain due to COVID-19 confinement , but last make it out to generally positive degree look back . dazzle as the refashion was , it lack anything new to allege and did n’t amount penny-pinching to the grandness of the pilot repair Mulan . read adjacent : The corking Animated Disney Hero Moments , place