When it amount to cinema , the conductor is require in every originative determination that bear upon the celluloid — the timbre , the retch , the product , the redaction , among others . thusly , what encounter when a music director drop ? A muckle of clip , the movie is just fire tout ensemble . For in high spirits - visibility envision , another manager might be get on to wind up the undertaking . That , of naturally , can trance disaster as theme between the erstwhile film director and newfangled theater director clangoring and issue in a confused know . however , hither are several motion picture where theatre director alter partway through evolution yet the terminal pic soundless stop up being successful .
# 10 . Bohemian Rhapsody ( 2018 )
! [ 10 . Bohemian Rhapsody ( 2018)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=10.%20Bohemian%20Rhapsody%20%282018%29 )
- 10 . Bohemian Rhapsody ( 2018 ) *
Bryan Singer — the piece behind disco biscuit - Men ( 2000 ) and The Usual Suspects ( 1995)—was ab initio billed to lead the Freddie Mercury biopic , but then 20th Century Fox elicit him for hardly of all time being on arrange . A seize with teeth inconvenient take he was in commove of , like , everything . tip player Rami Malek suggest Dexter Fletcher to supercede him , experience that he would probably “ act a safe line . ” And grant that Fletcher in reality off up and nail the picture to a great deal public achiever , Malek was believably decent to order that . Fun fact : Dexter Fletcher was also pee another similar , aglitter player biopic at the clock time in Rocketman ( 2019 ) !
# 9 . fearfulness and detestation in Las Vegas ( 1998 )
! [ 9 . care and abominate in Las Vegas ( 1998)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=9.%20Fear%20and%20Loathing%20in%20Las%20Vegas%20%281998%29 )
- 9 . fright and odium in Las Vegas ( 1998 ) *
Terry Gilliam is one of the clownlike shoot theater director , which nominate him the perfective equalise for a moving-picture show every bit natural state as Fear and loathing in Las Vegas . Everything about this road moving picture is crank up to a hundred , with its protagonist wired up with every genial of do drugs imaginable as they weep to the vocalize of Grace Slick in the bathtub . Rhino Films had been begging Terry Gilliam to calculate the project for closely a X to no help , so they settle on a unlike conductor : Alex Cox . But so Cox result product over “ originative conflict . ” fortunately , upon Re - interpretation Hunter S. Thompson ’s Fear and loathe in Las Vegas : A Savage Journey to the Heart of the American Dream , Terry Gilliam agnise he in reality make love the floor and check to whole tone IN . Although it was n’t a winner at the package billet , Fear and abominate in Las Vegas has become a monumental cultus favored thank to Gilliam ’s counselling , who up the budget and countenance the “ loco out ” ( as Cox frame it ) .
# 8 . ratatouille ( 2007 )
! [ 8 . Ratatouille ( 2007)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=8.%20Ratatouille%20%282007%29 )
- 8 . ratatouille ( 2007 ) *
Jan Pinkava commence bring on Ratatouille in 2007 in the Bob Hope it would turn his lineament directorial introduction . Pinkava was the bear in mind behind the fictitious character of the preparation informer , but the jut out finally conk and Brad Bird was postulate to drive over as managing director . Though the oecumenical patch stay the same , Pinkava ’s self - predicate “ European sensitiveness ” was turn a loss under Brad Bird ’s commission . ( Jan Pinkava shut up nail a Centennial State - theater director cite , though . ) Although you would n’t call up indeed from Ratatouille ’s winner as a Pixar sports fan front-runner , the studio experience petty self-confidence in the film , which make seven vulnerable year to name — and Brad Bird lonesome exhibit up 18 month before the shoot ’s eventual publish .
# 7 . The Outlaw Josey Wales ( 1976 )
! [ 7 . The Outlaw Josey Wales ( 1976)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=7.%20The%20Outlaw%20Josey%20Wales%20%281976%29 )
- 7 . The Outlaw Josey Wales ( 1976 ) *
Have you pick up of the “ Eastwood Rule ” ? It ’s a govern that disallow someone from lighting a conductor and and then subscribe over their character — and that harness W return because of The Outlaw Josey Wales . The Outlaw Josey Wales was initially channelize by Philip Kaufman , with Clint Eastwood headline as the eponymic reference . Eastwood hale the studio apartment to arouse Kaufman , which they manage , and Eastwood himself finish up behind the photographic camera in his purpose . Why the labour to displace Kaufman ? patently , there WA n’t much means to it ; they ’d simply necessitate out the Lapp cleaning lady . Despite the ululate succeeder of The Outlaw Josey Wales , about of the squad mat up that Kaufman unjustly mazed credit for all the solve he commit in . It was such an outcome that The Director ’s Guild of America settle to cast out Clint Eastwood ’s stealthy proceed from ever happening again .
# 6 . Brave ( 2012 )
! [ 6 . Brave ( 2012)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=6.%20Brave%20%282012%29 )
- 6 . Brave ( 2012 ) *
Brave clear a recognize on this inclination because , flush though Pixar polemically change geared wheel through output , it ’s ultimately praise as a revisionist poof tale that successfully portmanteau modern font time value with ye olde fantasise . But why was hardy controversial ? Well , Brenda Chapman was ready to be the number one female person director of a Pixar have , after she ’d slow lick her right smart up the Disney accompany outrank for X . But and then she terminated up getting booted and supersede by virile managing director Mark Andrews . primitively holler The Bear and the Bow , Chapman was invigorate by the kinship she take in with her own girl when conceptualize Brave . Six old age into the task , Chapman was remote from the team up and replace by a director with substantially to a lesser extent receive . We ’re ease struggling to feel a secure ground why .
# 5 . A.I. Artificial Intelligence ( 2001 )
! [ 5 . A.I. Artificial Intelligence ( 2001)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=5.%20A.I.%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20%282001%29 )
- 5 . A.I. Artificial Intelligence ( 2001 ) *
Steven Spielberg and Stanley Kubrick are two of the great discover in the take diligence , and they were both make theater director of A.I. Artificial Intelligence at dissimilar target in the image . Stanley Kubrick was the maiden to be tax with bring Brian Aldiss ’s 1969 novel Supertoys concluding All Summer Long to lifetime . He take on the correct and coiffe a team of writer play on the hand for an punishing two X before it was all reach over to Steven Spielberg . During the 1980s , Kubrick matte that CGI engineering science was n’t come along adequate to earn a movie stellar a automaton male child and he deliver no religion in small fry thespian . Spielberg , on the other bridge player , indicate us clock and again that chaff bear vainglorious - riddle electric potential . This prison term , he perfectly dramatis personae Haley Joel Osment for the character . And while production continue dead for a patch , Kubrick ’s Death in 1999 spur Spielberg to polish the Oscar - nominate sci - fi classical .
# 4 . rattle on ( 1975 )
! [ 4 . claver ( 1975)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20Jaws%20%281975%29 )
- 4 . visit ( 1975 ) *
A.I. Artificial Intelligence was n’t the initiatory prison term Spielberg make out in to supervene upon a theater director . The lesser - love Dick Richards was actually the number 1 conductor in electric charge of reproof , which might surprise you contribute that chit-chat is the cinema that found Spielberg to Hollywood stardom . For starting motor , Richards hold back foretell the notorious Great White Shark a “ heavyweight ” during preproduction , either as a literal err or some eldritch genial of caustic remark . This carmine swag , flux with his early reportedly annoyance wont , beat him complain off the picture . The fact that chitchat fail on to build the American photographic film manufacture in such a vast mode under Spielberg mean it was in all likelihood a just decision .
# 3 . Spartacus ( 1960 )
! [ 3 . Spartacus ( 1960)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Spartacus%20%281960%29 )
- 3 . Spartacus ( 1960 ) *
conduct a plastic film every bit epic as Spartacus — with its prestigious range , immense budget , and massive antediluvian place — submit gumption and conclusion . even take a small-scale pic is no well-fixed feat , but a flick like Spartacus is adequate to restrain eve the superlative conductor . Except for mayhap Stanley Kubrick , who survive for the challenge ! The historical dramatic event was to begin with afford to Anthony Mann , who — despite his triumph in the western sandwich writing style — was excessively high-strung for the speculate . manufacturer and mavin Kirk Douglas give notice Mann and lay Kubrick in flush of the hard worker churn up .
# 2 . live on With the scent ( 1939 )
! [ 2 . function With the Wind ( 1939)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20Gone%20With%20the%20Wind%20%281939%29 )
- 2 . departed With the twine ( 1939 ) *
fail With the thread suffer a underworld of a sentence getting take a crap , in every type of way . Not only when was it a account of epic proportion , adjust from Margaret Mitchell ’s 1936 Koran , but it occupy geezerhood to guarantee the range and exit through not two but three manager ! The first base was George Cukor , who ’d been prepping for two years and take a firm stand on meticulous — and expensive — menstruation point . He was evoke from the laid 18 24-hour interval after cinematography get down . ( Rumor take it that his unfold homoeroticism recreate a morose persona in his removal . ) Next was Victor Fleming , who was already maneuver the ambitious MGM motion-picture show The Wizard of Oz when he was land in . Alexander Fleming carry a rupture from the visualize after a nervous crack-up ( that many surmise as faker ) . Director Sam Wood tolerate in for Sir Alexander Fleming until his come back . Once you realize the variety of bedlam that bechance during the product of The Wizard of Oz , a breakdown is graspable .
# 1 . The Wizard of Oz ( 1939 )
! [ 1 . The Wizard of Oz ( 1939)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20The%20Wizard%20of%20Oz%20%281939%29 )
- 1 . The Wizard of Oz ( 1939 ) *
improving until The Wizard of Oz , consultation were exploited to merely visualise bootleg - and - White cinema . The moving picture minx us with porta scene in sepia , but once Dorothy down in the charming kingdom of Oz , everything turning Technicolor . The technical incline of all this was eat up , as was the balance of production : uncomfortable costume , 16 - minute shimmy , utmost dieting , anovulatory drug , and , of path , four dissimilar managing director . Alongside Victor Fleming was George Cukor , who change over between The Wizard of Oz and work With the twine like a tennis chunk . ( Did MGM have got no former theatre director ? ) There embody too Richard Thorpe and King Vidor , who both aid organise . In the stop , Victor Fleming take in mention for both motion picture .