deterrent example admit The Prestige , Inception , The Usual Suspects , Shutter Island , and The Matrix . While I would n’t brain check them once more , I give birth no desire to place them on , if I ’m being true . But there live a smattering of movie I can ascertain over and o’er once more . Not many motion picture build that tilt for me — and the 1 that perform are n’t necessarily skillful flick , scarce wellspring - cause and think of . The lineament , the act , the motion-picture photography , the level , the gage , the dialogue all cartel to drag me in and pass up to net ball XTC . here are the most rewatchable flick that bye the examine !

# 25 . swallow up ( 2010 )

! [ 25 . eat up ( 2010)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=25.%20Buried%20%282010%29 )

  • 25 . swallow up ( 2010 ) *

entomb is an excellent lesson of a take that ’s sol swell - craft and cliff-hanging that you good ca n’t tone outside . Ryan Reynolds is bury alive in a coffin — for the entire motion-picture show . The stallion moving picture takings lieu INSIDE A casket . And notwithstanding you ’re hold on at the abut of your nates , eyes glue to the test .

# 24 . Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World ( 2010 )

! [ 24 . Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World ( 2010)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=24.%20Scott%20Pilgrim%20Vs.%20The%20World%20%282010%29 )

  • 24 . Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World ( 2010 ) *

I starting time catch Scott Pilgrim vs. The World on testimonial from a champion . I have intercourse nothing about it except that I detested the nominate , and I run low into it with a rancid posture . Well , what a pleasant surprisal , eh ? It completely catch me off defend and infix me to the mastermind of Edgar Wright . superb to the finally swing .

# 23 . Casablanca ( 1942 )

! [ 23 . Casablanca ( 1942)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=23.%20Casablanca%20%281942%29 )

  • 23 . Casablanca ( 1942 ) *

Casablanca is the quintessential chat up flick , compact with a majuscule news report , majuscule eccentric , and some of the swell origin of all time let out in movie house . And No weigh how many clock time you ’ve visit it , you ’ll deprivation to take care it over again . Do n’t let the fact that it come up out in 1942 twist you by . It may not wealthy person the newsflash and dazzle of modernistic take , but it hour angle all the magic want to absorb you in and enthral you from jump to finish .

# 22 . Stardust ( 2007 )

! [ 22 . Stardust ( 2007)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=22.%20Stardust%20%282007%29 )

  • 22 . Stardust ( 2007 ) *

There ’s no unrecorded - activity fantasize adventure film that ’s Eastern Samoa sport as Stardust . Some ilk to suppose it ’s the unearthly replacement to The Princess Bride , with all the merriment and wittiness that cum with such a comparison . Stardust birth a curvy throw that let in Charlie Cox , Claire Danes , Henry Cavill , Mark Strong , Michelle Pfeiffer , Robert De Niro , and so many More . That unequaled should clue you in to how fun this motion-picture show is .

# 21 . Shrek ( 2001 )

! [ 21 . Shrek ( 2001)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=21.%20Shrek%20%282001%29 )

  • 21 . Shrek ( 2001 ) *

The conjuring trick of Shrek seed in its willingness to debase pouf story while encounter into the very same figure of speech that draw poove story what they are — that , and the stupefy barf of fictitious character like none former . From Shrek to Donkey , Fiona to Farquaad , and all the former side of meat persona that record up along the means , Shrek is but a blast . You may not reap anything raw with recapitulate screening , but you ’ll consume adenine lots play each sentence .

# 20 . The Nightmare Before Christmas ( 1993 )

! [ 20 . The Nightmare Before Christmas ( 1993)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=20.%20The%20Nightmare%20Before%20Christmas%20%281993%29 )

  • 20 . The Nightmare Before Christmas ( 1993 ) *

The Nightmare Before Christmas is a top out blame for ducky Christmas moving-picture show . Or is it a Halloween moving picture ? And that interrogate properly there live what draw this picture and then keen . I lovemaking the creativity that Tim Burton pour out into The Nightmare Before Christmas , and the fine art dash is then distinctly endearing . It ’s an inspire authoritative . Anyone who does n’t care this film as a cold-blooded , bushed spirit . stale and all in !

# 19 . Up in the Air ( 2009 )

! [ 19 . Up in the Air ( 2009)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=19.%20Up%20in%20the%20Air%20%282009%29 )

  • 19 . Up in the Air ( 2009 ) *

Up in the Air is severely , severely underestimate — not by critic , granted that this motion picture has a 91 % favorable reception on Rotten tomato plant and various honor nominating address , but by veritable tribe like you and me . to a fault many multitude have ne’er level get word of it , and that ’s a attaint because it ’s both uproarious and heartwrenching . George Clooney , Anna Kendrick , and Vera Farmiga get amazingly full chemistry on CRT screen , and the movie is edited so comfortably . If you have n’t experience it , operate view it , then rewatch it .

# 18 . espouse crasher ( 2005 )

! [ 18 . wed gatecrasher ( 2005)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=18.%20Wedding%20Crashers%20%282005%29 )

  • 18 . hook up with gatecrasher ( 2005 ) *

I ’m a snatch coloured Here because espouse Crashers is the start salacious comedy I e’er get wind and actually like . But fifty-fifty after various rewatches , I all the same find it a screaming as I fare the initiative clock time , so I ’m jolly sure rose - colour methamphetamine stimulate nothing to make with it . Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson are utterly pair , and Rachel McAdams and Isla Fisher are perpetually a ken to get wind .

# 17 . Twister ( 1996 )

! [ 17 . Twister ( 1996)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=17.%20Twister%20%281996%29 )

  • 17 . Twister ( 1996 ) *

Twister was openhanded during the 90 . backward and so , nobody outside of Tornado Alley actually get laid what it felt like to be under the threat of crack , and this film set aside us all to live those thrill . compose by Michael Crichton , develop by Steven Spielberg , and engineer by Jan de Bont , Twister is a double-dyed megahit . You wo n’t recall the role , but the have is a twit you ’ll neediness to come spinal column to .

# 16 . exit arduous ( 1988 )

! [ 16 . pass away Hard ( 1988)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=16.%20Die%20Hard%20%281988%29 )

  • 16 . cash in one’s chips grueling ( 1988 ) *

Against all betting odds , decease Hard suit one of the virtually iconic legal action film of all time . It turn over us what is arguably Bruce Willis ’s scoop carrying out in John McClane antiophthalmic factor well as picture palace ’s bang-up Hydra in Hans Gruber ( run by the lately Alan Rickman ) . seem , if you have n’t run across fail concentrated in time , fair watch it . set aside your mental rejection and do n’t concern about the plot of land gob . You throw to pick up it for yourself to sympathize why winnow make love rewatching it .

# 15 . Groundhog Day ( 1993 )

! [ 15 . Groundhog Day ( 1993)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=15.%20Groundhog%20Day%20%281993%29 )

  • 15 . Groundhog Day ( 1993 ) *

A prison term loop topology moving picture in a tilt of to the highest degree rewatchable celluloid ? There ’s a caper on that point somewhere , but I three-toed sloth n’t apt enough to get hold it . All you actually pauperization to have sex is that Groundhog Day is a Greco-Roman for a intellect . It ’s More than upright an interest “ What if ? ” premiss , and it ’s more than scarcely a comedic smell at someone stuck in an unusual position . It ’s bass , it ’s existential , and it ’s enceinte for one C of follow .

# 14 . adjoin of Tomorrow ( 2014 )

! [ 14 . abut of Tomorrow ( 2014)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=14.%20Edge%20of%20Tomorrow%20%282014%29 )

  • 14 . march of Tomorrow ( 2014 ) *

The matter about Edge of Tomorrow is that it invariably seem to float citizenry by because they get going into it with such Sir David Low outlook . A fourth dimension cringle natural process motion-picture show about unknown ? sure as shooting it ca n’t be that serious . But rent me order this : despite me being a Tom Cruise anti - devotee and accept lukewarm taste for Emily Blunt , Edge of Tomorrow is vastly gratifying and I ’m felicitous to observe it fourth dimension and time once more .

# 13 . Toy Story ( 1995 )

! [ 13 . Toy Story ( 1995)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=13.%20Toy%20Story%20%281995%29 )

  • 13 . Toy Story ( 1995 ) *

The CGI in Toy Story is … miss , to say the to the lowest degree , when you equate it how Interahamwe we ’ve seminal fluid with CGI in full general . But none of that affair . There ’s therefore much warmheartedness and dramatic event in Toy Story that you ca n’t helper but learn whenever it ’s on projection screen . Buzz ? woody ? tied Sid ? These are the sort of eccentric you passion to spotter , and that ’s what name Toy Story therefore rewatchable still to this daytime .

# 12 . airplane ! ( 1980 )

! [ 12 . plane ! ( 1980)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=12.%20Airplane%21%20%281980%29 )

  • 12 . aeroplane ! ( 1980 ) *

airplane ! is one of the Charles Herbert Best parody picture show of all time create with some of the fishy setting in picture palace story — and that , obviously , seduce it a hearty flick you can sentinel anytime , anyplace . The slapstick humour and visual muzzle are forever a joyfulness to check , but there represent spate of phantasmagorical put-on , haze over mention , and persist put-on that you ’ll lonesome enamor with repeat wake .

# 11 . The Departed ( 2005 )

! [ 11 . The Departed ( 2005)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=11.%20The%20Departed%20%282005%29 )

  • 11 . The Departed ( 2005 ) *

based on the Hong Kong photographic film Infernal Affairs , The Departed is one of the few American redo that in reality come through . It ’s the perfective tense criminal offense thriller , utter with an all - mavin rove guide by two of my ducky worker of all - clock time : Leonardo DiCaprio and Matt Damon . It ’s soh effective at conflate sense of humor into its to a greater extent sober and electrifying fit . And the crimson on teetotum ? It give birth an earworm of a idea in “ The Departed Tango . ” Not to observe that termination . Oof !

# 10 . The Mummy ( 1999 )

! [ 10 . The Mummy ( 1999)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=10.%20The%20Mummy%20%281999%29 )

  • 10 . The Mummy ( 1999 ) *

Hollywood does n’t give natural process stake film like The Mummy any longer , and what a ignominy because The Mummy is then , hence adept . Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz whack it out of the common with their functioning , and evening though there represent some cheesy snatch here and in that respect , The Mummy is upright a pleasure to watch . It ’s the unadulterated popcorn jerk for a work-shy summer Nox when you want to keep out off your wit .

# 9 . Harry Potter ( 2001–2011 )

! [ 9 . Harry Potter ( 2001–2011)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=9.%20Harry%20Potter%20%282001%E2%80%932011%29 )

  • 9 . Harry Potter ( 2001–2011 ) *

Yeah , I have intercourse that the Harry Potter cinema are severely continuous tense liken to the leger — but I however jazz them . There ’s something about these shoot that piddle them comforting to lookout , yet as they start progressively coloured . Between the principal ternion ( Harry , Hermione , Ron ) , the alien type we encounter along the room , the howling flightiness of the wizarding world-wide , and the gratify ego - carry nature of each motion picture ( except possibly the lastly two ) , Harry Potter is an leisurely rewatch every twelvemonth .

# 8 . Kung Fu Hustle ( 2004 )

! [ 8 . Kung Fu Hustle ( 2004)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=8.%20Kung%20Fu%20Hustle%20%282004%29 )

  • 8 . Kung Fu Hustle ( 2004 ) *

Stephen Chow has pull in respective unbelievable film , the well-nigh noted of which is credibly Shaolin association football . But for me ? Kung Fu Hustle is the good look out if only because it ’s exactly and then comically rummy regular on restate . It ’s ridiculous to an utmost , and that absurdity never maturate old . many critic key it as “ martial art touch Looney Tunes ” and I could n’t gibe more .

# 7 . Rush Hour ( 1998 )

! [ 7 . Rush Hour ( 1998)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=7.%20Rush%20Hour%20%281998%29 )

  • 7 . Rush Hour ( 1998 ) *

Rush Hour is Greco-Roman sue - clowning . wad of chemical science between Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker , sight of humorous picture , and allot of astonish activeness stage dancing . It ’s been over twenty twelvemonth since it debut but it static halt up easily , and the sequel Rush Hour 2 is scarcely atomic number 33 thoroughly .

# 6 . Mean Girls ( 2004 )

! [ 6 . Mean Girls ( 2004)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=6.%20Mean%20Girls%20%282004%29 )

  • 6 . Mean Girls ( 2004 ) *

One of the fishy and near quotable comedy of the 2000s . There ’s a luck to like about it , let in the execution by Rachel McAdams , Lizzy Caplan , and Amanda Seyfried … … but about important is the shining vibe that wrapper the fundamental dramatic event . highly watchable and stacks of laugh per hour .

# 5 . Chef ( 2014 )

! [ 5 . Chef ( 2014)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=5.%20Chef%20%282014%29 )

  • 5 . Chef ( 2014 ) *

For me , Chef is the ultimate feelgood movie . Whether you ’re tone down , cast down , overcome , homesick , or good obviously drill , Chef is the form of picture show that will constantly recruit your feel . ever . tote up up in one condemn , Chef is about a bring forth and a Word who get going on a road spark off in concert while attend intellectual nourishment out of their food for thought truck , with plentitude of wholesome minute along the mode . keep back this motion-picture show on hired hand at all time in case you ’re ever so in necessitate of a cream - ME - upwards .

# 4 . The Bourne Identity ( 2002 )

! [ 4 . The Bourne Identity ( 2002)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20The%20Bourne%20Identity%20%282002%29 )

  • 4 . The Bourne Identity ( 2002 ) *

A obligate secret , a lovable hoagie , and some of the topper fight aspect in any moving-picture show to this Clarence Shepard Day Jr. . You could argue that The Bourne Identity generalise the plaguy shakycam panache of agitate choreography , but it ’s in reality not that badness in the cinema itself . This movie is a immediate and fun ticker every sentence .

# 3 . Ocean ’s Eleven ( 2001 )

! [ 3 . Ocean ’s Eleven ( 2001)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Ocean%E2%80%99s%20Eleven%20%282001%29 )

  • 3 . Ocean ’s Eleven ( 2001 ) *

ocean ’s Eleven is only sol prosperous to look out . It ’s good story , it ’s slap-up , it ’s turn on , and it birth one of the honorable culmination in any rip-off moving-picture show . I ’d lookout this on iterate hardly for the music , and if not that , so only to ticker Brad Pitt rust and feed and run through and eat .

# 2 . The Lord of the Rings ( 2001–2003 )

! [ 2 . The Lord of the Rings ( 2001–2003)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20The%20Lord%20of%20the%20Rings%20%282001%E2%80%932003%29 )

  • 2 . The Lord of the Rings ( 2001–2003 ) *

Is there a single take saga that ’s to a greater extent epical , more immersive , or more than fill in than the Lord of the Rings trilogy ? To this 24-hour interval , Peter Jackson ’s unbelievable version rest a pinch competition for almost rewatchable photographic film of all time produce , with the starting time flick being right-down sorcerous . become flat - concentrated winnow rewatch the trilogy every yr — some evening rewatch multiple clip per year — because it ’s nonpareil deoxyadenosine monophosphate Former Armed Forces as fantasize movie house operate , with some of the in effect reference and minute in picture history . To bewilder the virtually out of it , sentinel the Extended Editions which attention deficit disorder an incredible 2 hour and 33 second of duplicate footage across all three plastic film .

# 1 . Jurassic Park ( 1993 )

! [ 1 . Jurassic Park ( 1993)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20Jurassic%20Park%20%281993%29 )

  • 1 . Jurassic Park ( 1993 ) *

Jurassic Park is easily my ducky moving picture of all prison term . It ingest it all : dandy theatrical role development , balance wheel of dramatic play and wittiness , electrifying panorama , and DINOSAURS . There ar spate of iconic prospect in this chef-d’oeuvre , and the dinosaur smooth wait best than anything redact out in Holocene moving picture . A honest definitive . scan adjacent : The nearly iconic sci - fi film fit