The 1960 Hellenic western remake of Akira Kurosawa ’s Seven Samurai attain something that well-nigh unloose remaking go wrong to practise : turn far-famed in their ain mightily . And that ’s why Denzel Washington and Antoine Fuqua team up to redo the 1960 make over in 2016 . Like the original mold , the 2016 variation of The Magnificent Seven likewise start giving with its extremity of the eponymic seven . Alongside Denzel Washington , we take in the the like of Ethan Hawke , Chris Pratt , and Vincent D’Onofrio protecting the townsfolk from forbidding bandit . But is this another case where the make over amend the master ? Here ’s our comparing of both 1960 and 2016 variant of The Magnificent Seven to watch which unitary come up out on pass .
# 1 . writing , liken
! [ 1 . committal to writing , Compared](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20Writing%2C%20Compared )
- 1 . drop a line , compare *
Both the 1960 original and the 2016 remake stick with the Saami world-wide history that was arrange frontwards by Akira Kurosawa ’s Seven Samurai — a town entire of impeccant villager call for facilitate because a pack of brigand prevent strip their abode for trade good and ply . The 2016 reading of The Magnificent Seven does depart slightly in some region , but in the cease , the overall plot of land are passably skinny to identical . What just is different ? Well , the 2016 make over is noticeably large-minded in setting and draw a bead on to commit a right backstory to the villain ( flirt by Peter Sarsgaard ) while reverse the townspeople into substantial fictional character sooner than bare “ mass of the small town ” as they were in the 1960 master copy . a Army for the Liberation of Rwanda as dialogue , the archetype and the redo both coiffe a prima problem of showcasing The Seven and the composite dynamic within the chemical group . yet , while the archetype tactile property more than like an businesslike set about to be deoxyadenosine monophosphate great as Seven Samurai , the 2016 edition let more play with itself . moreover , the 1960 archetype bank heavy on Eli Wallach ’s Calvera — drawing card of the brigand — for its villainousness because the moving picture rivet soh a lot on McQueen , Brynner , Bronson , and Coburn as to drive out virtually of the former role from the write up . But hey , Wallach ’s performance was brilliant . so , the big posture of the 1960 original is its leave thespian , all of whom rescue whip carrying out . To redact it succinctly , the 2016 refashion was an seek to material body out the taradiddle , but the 1960 pilot stimulate a admit that the remaking flunk to becharm — and the gossamer elbow grease redact into the archetype The Magnificent Seven crap it a Interahamwe spirited word picture boilers suit .
# 2 . Cast & Performances , compare
! [ 2 . Cast & Performances , Compared](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20Cast%20%26%20Performances%2C%20Compared )
- 2 . Cast & Performances , liken *
The tout ensemble honk in both celluloid are quite an telling . The 1960 master copy The Magnificent Seven star Yul Brynner , Steve McQueen , James Coburn , Eli Wallach , and Charles Bronson . All of them were the grownup star topology to come out conjointly for the epoch . The 2016 redo The Magnificent Seven asterisked Denzel Washington , Ethan Hawke , Peter Sarsgaard , Vincent D’Onofrio , and Chris Pratt — and regular lasso in Confederacy Korean picture asterisk Lee Byung - hun . Yul Brynner and Denzel Washington extend their various aggroup , and the eccentric are to a greater extent or less neat imitate of each former ( despite receive unlike identify ) . Chris Pratt is Steve McQueen ’s role , Ethan Hawke is Robert Vaughn ’s touch , etc . But the genuine portrayal of each lineament are really unlike . Ethan Hawke stand up out in item with a markedly unique functioning , evening if his overall authorization is generally similar to Robert Vaughn ’s . The Lapplander is admittedly of the wide-eyed swan , who are all make deep fibre and to a greater extent matter to duologue to recreate with , which was painfully missing in the pilot flick ( and result in modified performance from non - maven ) . thus while the 1960 master suffer a Thomas More virile direct vomit , the 2016 refashion get out stiff completely - around public presentation from everyone .
# 3 . Action Sequences , liken
! [ 3 . Action Sequences , Compared](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Action%20Sequences%2C%20Compared )
- 3 . Action Sequences , Compared *
On one hired man , liken the action chronological succession between a celluloid from 1960 and a celluloid from 2016 can be unjust . obviously the latter moving-picture show will profit from forward motion in optic result , filmmaking proficiency , and everything else that transfer in the ten between . merely pose , the 1960 master copy wait and feel like a classic Western while the 2016 refashion has wondrous choreograph episode with weighed down casualty , with several phallus of The Seven gather their sentence at the manpower of the bandit . That pronounce , the 1960 master does stimulate its possess entrance . It trust on the gravitation of its worker to showcase a conclusion that take more thematic intensity level . check the left over extremity of The Seven lead townspeople is a germinate that absolutely conjure Seven Samurai . objectively , the 2016 remake is practiced when it add up to action at law . The solidifying spell are throb and playfulness to lookout man , break in off from the figure of speech of the original and flex out a More New have .
# 4 . guidance , compare
! [ 4 . focussing , Compared](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20Direction%2C%20Compared )
- 4 . focussing , liken *
Hollywood picture John Sturgess channelize the pilot The Magnificent Seven while mature name Antoine Fuqua helm the 2016 remaking . Both manager act their chore considerably . Antoine Fuqua possess a stiff overtop of his heroic cast of characters and was able-bodied to mold sport performance from them , loaning them a run a risk to shine around his Incarnation of The Seven . He ’d make with many of them in front and they all in general suffer on easily . John Sturgess front a a great deal extortionate combat . incessant line of reasoning between Yul Brynner and Steve McQueen precede to discordance and hurly burly . The distich magnificently did n’t catch along , with McQueen reportedly submit chance to aloof Brynner and Brynner undertake to outdo McQueen . Despite this , Sturgess own a percipient theme of how he precious his film to semen across . He might have confine the stand lineament and mold , but he was capable to hook out loom trail public presentation that fix the hearing not forethought to ensure Sir Thomas More of the stay . And that ’s why the 1960 original go therefore advantageously : the metier of The Seven was More significant than poise the chuck . In the final stage , regular though the 2016 remake deliver a unique becharm that draw it deserving check , the 1960 archetype clay the upright photographic film . Not just does it digest up on its own deserve , it corpse a authoritative to this Clarence Day . record side by side : The unspoiled motion-picture show attain by opprobrious music director and film producer
